[Auscope-geosciml] RE: GeoSciML mapping file

Simon.Cox at csiro.au Simon.Cox at csiro.au
Mon Apr 27 02:46:11 EDT 2009


We need to do a full re-working of gsml:Borehole, with a better set of requirements as a starting point.
You will recall that all the 'details' were added in that 2 hour meeting with Jon Huntington in Melbourne.
Not exactly an exhaustive evaluation ...

Best - Simon
________________________________
From: Bruce.Simons at dpi.vic.gov.au [Bruce.Simons at dpi.vic.gov.au]
Sent: Monday, 27 April 2009 7:11 AM
To: Cox, Simon (E&M, Kensington)
Cc: Tan, Florence (E&M, Kensington); Gerrard.Christie at saugov.sa.gov.au; Duclaux, Guillaume (E&M, Kensington); Jenkins.Gregory at saugov.sa.gov.au; Warren, Peter (E&M, North Ryde); Fraser, Ryan (E&M, Kensington); auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Subject: RE: GeoSciML mapping file


Simon,
1. Is  gsml:Borehole/sa:relatedSamplingFeature/sa:SamplingFeatureRelation/sa:target/sa:Specimen/sa:currentLocation/gmd:CI_Address not allowed at the moment?

2. "The BoreholeDetails/startPoint/BoreholeStartPointCode path does not look like it would easily capture that logic"
I agree.  I suggest that this should be changed to either a numeric value or a numeric value and BoreholeStartPointCode.

3. Some other isues that have come up as part of the mapping:
3a gsml:drillingMethod (1..1).  The drillingMethod may actually vary down the Borehole (RAB then diamond core then RAB etc).  The current model does not allow this. A simple solution is to change the cardinality to (1..*). A preferable solution would be to relate individual MappedIntervals to the different drillingMethods.
3b. A similar case as 2a exists for nominalDiameter, which may also vary down the Borehole

Cheers
Bruce Simons
GeoScience Victoria
EARTH RESOURCES DIVISION
Department of Primary Industries
Melbourne, Victoria
AUSTRALIA
Ph: +61-3-9658 4502
Fax: +61-3-9658 4555


<Simon.Cox at csiro.au>

24/04/2009 05:00 PM


To
        <Jenkins.Gregory at saugov.sa.gov.au>, <Guillaume.Duclaux at csiro.au>, <Bruce.Simons at dpi.vic.gov.au>, <Gerrard.Christie at saugov.sa.gov.au>, <Peter.Warren at csiro.au>
cc
        <Florence.Tan at csiro.au>, <Ryan.Fraser at csiro.au>
Subject
        RE: GeoSciML mapping file







1. Greg - you can't just pick fields at random from within ISO 19115.
They have to be valid in the context of the object being described.
There is currently no valid path from gsml:Borehole to gmd:CI_Address/gmd:administrativeArea.
   gsml:Borehole/sa:relatedSamplingFeature/sa:SamplingFeatureRelation/sa:target/sa:Specimen/sa:currentLocation/gmd:EX_GeographicDescription/gmd:geographicIdentifier/gmd:MD_Identifier/gmd:code
is the best we can do. A (sensible) revision of the sampling features spec would see
   gsml:Borehole/sa:relatedSamplingFeature/sa:SamplingFeatureRelation/sa:target/sa:Specimen/sa:currentLocation/gmd:CI_Address/gmd:adminstrativeArea, as you require, because there are no mandatory fields in CI_Address. If you want to just put the town, that would be valid.

2. Thanks for explanation of start-depth.
I had not realised that a collar was not necessarily the same as the drilling start point.
So, it looks like the gsml Borehole model may require some fixing to accommodate this - the GSML v2 model is here: http://www.geosciml.org/geosciml/2.0/doc/Images/EAID_6135C407_EC75_417d_B400_877478C4C485.gif.
The BoreholeDetails/startPoint/BoreholeStartPointCode path does not look like it would easily capture that logic.
No-one caught this during the GeoSciML review period ...

Simon

______
Simon.Cox at csiro.au  CSIRO Exploration & Mining
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151
PO Box 1130, Bentley WA 6102  AUSTRALIA
T: +61 (0)8 6436 8639  Cell: +61 (0) 403 302 672
Polycom PVX: 130.116.146.28
<http://www.csiro.au<http://www.csiro.au/>>

ABN: 41 687 119 230



________________________________
From: Jenkins, Gregory (PIRSA) [mailto:Jenkins.Gregory at saugov.sa.gov.au]
Sent: Friday, 24 April 2009 2:21 PM
To: Duclaux, Guillaume (E&M, Kensington); Bruce.Simons at dpi.vic.gov.au; Gerrard, Christie (PIRSA); Warren, Peter (E&M, North Ryde)
Cc: Tan, Florence (E&M, Kensington); Fraser, Ryan (E&M, Kensington); Cox, Simon (E&M, Kensington)
Subject: RE: GeoSciML mapping file

See below and attached file.

Regards,
Greg Jenkins
Program Leader Geoscientific Information Management
Geological Survey Branch
Division of Minerals & Energy Resources
PIRSA

t       08 8463 3074
f       08 8463 3089
e       mailto:jenkins.gregory at saugov.sa.gov.au
w       www.minerals.pir.sa.gov.au
The information contained within this email is confidential and may be the subject of legal privilege. This email is intended solely for the addressee, and if you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose, copy, use or distribute this email or any of its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please advise the sender immediately via reply email, delete the message and any attachments from your system, and destroy any copies made. PIRSA makes no representation that this email or any attached files are free from viruses or other defects. It is the recipient's responsibility to check the email and any attached files for viruses or other defects.


________________________________
From: Guillaume.Duclaux at csiro.au [mailto:Guillaume.Duclaux at csiro.au]
Sent: Friday, 24 April 2009 2:54 PM
To: Jenkins, Gregory (PIRSA); Bruce.Simons at dpi.vic.gov.au; Gerrard, Christie (PIRSA); Peter.Warren at csiro.au
Cc: Florence.Tan at csiro.au; Ryan.Fraser at csiro.au; Simon.Cox at csiro.au
Subject: FW: GeoSciML mapping file

Hey guys,

Florence and I dived into the PIRSA drill hole mapping file yesterday.
We found some odd GeoSciML properties associated with HEADER FIELD LIBRARYNAME, STARTDEPTH and ENDDEPTH.  In the first column of the mapping file we propose alternative GeoSciML properties that should be more relevant with the SA_GEODATA FIELD. Please give us some feedback with those.  Full specification of core library address is overkill - the full address is available through other sources. Town/suburb should be sufficient. This was discussed during the mapping exercise.

Simon also reviewed the mapping file and helped us completing the GeoSciML xpaths.

Some other questions rose as we looked at the SA_GEODATA FIELD. For example: What is the difference between DD_DRILLHOLE.START_DEPTH and DC_DRILLING.DRILL_FR, and DD_DRILLHOLE.MAX_DRILLED_DEPTH and DC_DRILLING.DRILL_TO?   Refer attached spreadsheet for comments.  We probably have to consider different cases if the bore hole is vertical or not-vertical.  No - this is legacy non-rigorous field nomenclature, and actually refers to length along the drill stem.

2 other points: Is there some field in the PIRSA DB defining the unit system used for the depth and other fields?  All depths/lengths are stored and served in metres. Same question for the projection system used. It is specified in the mapping file comment that the PIRSA Data are projected in the GDA97  GDA94  coordinate system, but it might be wrong for data older than 1997.  All XY coordinates to be served will be in GDA94 regardless of datum of coordinates submitted - the system transforms submitted coordinates to GDA94. Submitted coordinates will not be exposed.

Cheers

on behalf of Florence and Guillaume.


[cid:_1_07337878079774C4007F6B2FCA2575A4]

[cid:_1_0733820407337E1C007F6B2FCA2575A4]       Dr Guillaume Duclaux
Structural Geologist/Modeller
CSIRO Exploration and Mining
Visiting address: 6G13, ARRC, 26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington, Western Australia, 6151
Postal address: PO Box 1130, Bentley, Western Australia, 6102, Australia
Ph: + 61 8 6436 8728  Fax: + 61 8 6436 8555  Web: www.em.csiro.au<http://www.em.csiro.au/>



________________________________

From: Tan, Florence (E&M, Kensington)
Sent: Thursday, 23 April 2009 1:22 PM
To: Duclaux, Guillaume (E&M, Kensington)
Subject: FW: GeoSciML mapping file




________________________________

From: Jenkins, Gregory (PIRSA) [mailto:Jenkins.Gregory at saugov.sa.gov.au]
Sent: Thursday, 23 April 2009 10:02 AM
To: 'Bruce.Simons at dpi.vic.gov.au'
Cc: Tan, Florence (E&M, Kensington); Warren, Peter (E&M, North Ryde); Gerrard, Christie (PIRSA)
Subject: RE: GeoSciML mapping file
Bruce

Rapidly modified spreadsheet attached. I think we need to deliberate drilling methods rigorously when the boreholes working group is fully operational.

Regards,
Greg.


________________________________

From: Bruce.Simons at dpi.vic.gov.au [mailto:Bruce.Simons at dpi.vic.gov.au]
Sent: Thursday, 23 April 2009 9:32 AM
To: Jenkins, Gregory (PIRSA)
Cc: Florence.Tan at csiro.au; 'Peter.Warren at csiro.au'
Subject: RE: GeoSciML mapping file

Greg
I've mapped the Borehole drilling methods to the available GeoSciML enumeration list.
As you can see there are a number that don't match the GeoSciML.

I have suggested in the comments field what the possible GeoSciML mapping could be. Could you confirm these, please?

There are some I am unsure of (eg Calweld). If these do not map to any of the GeoSciML terms, and they are drilling, could you provide a description for them and I'll try to get the GeoSciML enumeration expanded.

Cheers
Bruce Simons
GeoScience Victoria
EARTH RESOURCES DIVISION
Department of Primary Industries
Melbourne, Victoria
AUSTRALIA
Ph: +61-3-9658 4502
Fax: +61-3-9658 4555



"Jenkins, Gregory (PIRSA)" <Jenkins.Gregory at saugov.sa.gov.au>

23/04/2009 06:39 AM

To
        "'Peter.Warren at csiro.au'" <Peter.Warren at csiro.au>
cc
        "Florence.Tan at csiro.au" <Florence.Tan at csiro.au>, Bruce Simons <bruce.simons at dpi.vic.gov.au>
Subject
        RE: GeoSciML mapping file










Good morning Peter,

Attached is the spreadsheet of mapping. Bruce, the second tab on the spreadsheet contains the current list of drilling methods as requested.

Regards,
Greg Jenkins
Program Leader Geoscientific Information Management
Geological Survey Branch
Division of Minerals & Energy Resources
PIRSA

t       08 8463 3074
f       08 8463 3089
e       mailto:jenkins.gregory at saugov.sa.gov.au
w       www.minerals.pir.sa.gov.au
The information contained within this email is confidential and may be the subject of legal privilege. This email is intended solely for the addressee, and if you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose, copy, use or distribute this email or any of its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please advise the sender immediately via reply email, delete the message and any attachments from your system, and destroy any copies made. PIRSA makes no representation that this email or any attached files are free from viruses or other defects. It is the recipient's responsibility to check the email and any attached files for viruses or other defects.

________________________________

From: Peter.Warren at csiro.au [mailto:Peter.Warren at csiro.au]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 April 2009 4:21 PM
To: Jenkins, Gregory (PIRSA)
Cc: Florence.Tan at csiro.au
Subject: GeoSciML mapping file

Hi Greg,

Thank you for your time on Thursday.  I think we achieved some important objectives.

Can you please email me the GeoSciML borehole to SA_Geodata mapping file you created.  Florence CCed will be creating the WFS configuration file from the mapping.


Thanks
Pete


Peter Warren
Software Engineer
NVCL Development<http://nvcl.csiro.au/>
CSIRO Exploration and Mining
peter.warren at csiro.au<mailto:peter.warren at csiro.au>
Phone : (02) 9490 8802
[attachment "20090416_dh_mapping.xls" deleted by Bruce Simons/DPI/VICGOV1]

Notice:
This email and any attachments may contain information that is personal, confidential,
legally privileged and/or copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the prior written consent of the copyright owner.

It is the responsibility of the recipient to check for and remove viruses.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return email, delete it from your system and destroy any copies. You are not authorised to use, communicate or rely on the information contained in this email.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ATT00001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 239 bytes
Desc: ATT00001.gif
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/geosciml/attachments/20090427/14856512/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ATT00002.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 2094 bytes
Desc: ATT00002.gif
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/geosciml/attachments/20090427/14856512/attachment-0001.gif>


More information about the GeoSciML mailing list