[Auscope-geosciml] GeologicSpecimen (Which O&M version for GeoSciML - a follow up) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

stephen richard steve.richard at azgs.az.gov
Wed Oct 21 01:12:55 EDT 2009


or do we use the 19156 OM_process, which is even more abstract, 
requiring a GeologicSamplingProcess subtype. It looks to me like 
creating our own process subtype is what the 19156 model steers one 
towards...
steve

Bruce.Simons at dpi.vic.gov.au wrote:
> ......
>
> However the latest version of HollowWorld:SensorML appears to have 
> deleted all these useful properties:
>
>
> Can we re-introduce the model and/or method properties and the 
> ProcessMethod DataType or do we need to create a GeologicSamplingProcess?
>
> Bruce
>
> GeoScience Victoria
> EARTH RESOURCES DIVISION
> Department of Primary Industries
> Melbourne, Victoria
> AUSTRALIA
> Ph: +61-3-9658 4502
> Fax: +61-3-9658 4555
> Mobile: +61 429 177155
>
>
> *<Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au>*
> Sent by: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au
>
> 21/10/2009 09:53 AM
> Please respond to
> auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
>
>
> 	
> To
> 	<auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au>
> cc
> 	
> Subject
> 	Re: [Auscope-geosciml] GeologicSpecimen (Which O&M version        for 
>        GeoSciML - a follow up) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Bruce, Steve et al
>  
> I would also support the solution of adding an explicit “specimenType” 
> attribute to ISO SFN_Specimen rather than a soft-typed option like 
> NamedValue.  I have the ISO form from Chris Body for this, and I’ll 
> fill it in for specimenType and circulate it.  If we get it added to 
> SFN_Specimen, then that should kill off any need for a 
> GeologicSpecimen class.
>  
> Re: Steve’s questions
>  
> - /“Use SFN_Specimen in ISO19156 O&M? it has all properties of 
> LocatedSpecimen ?”/  Yes and yes.  The new SFN_Specimen has all the 
> properties of the old sa:LocatedSpecimen (including currentLocation) 
> _except_ that the link to surveyProcedure is indirect (via a 
> relatedSamplingfeature) rather than a direct link.
>  
> - /“OM_Process is abstract ....I think we need a concrete subtype of 
> OM_Process for geologic sampling procedures--one that at least allows 
> ScopedName for the prodedure type so controlledVocabulary can be 
> used.”/   What you describe is as I have modelled in the proposed v3.0 
> UML:
>  
>  
> Cheers,
> Ollie
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> /-----------/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Auscope-geosciml mailing list
> Auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
> http://lists.arcs.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/auscope-geosciml
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/geosciml/attachments/20091020/1fec8013/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 5937 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/geosciml/attachments/20091020/1fec8013/attachment.gif>


More information about the GeoSciML mailing list