[auscope-geosciml] problem with RockMaterial and FabricDescription

Guillaume.Duclaux at csiro.au Guillaume.Duclaux at csiro.au
Mon Aug 9 01:24:33 EDT 2010


Steve, 

I agree with you and IMHO all codeLists and CGI_Terms should be byReference and point to a controlled vocab.

Cheers

Gilly
On 09/08/2010, at 1:19 PM, Stephen M Richard wrote:

>  What is the logic for use of CGI_Term as the type for 
> RockMaterial.lithology or for FabricDescription.fabricType.  In both 
> cases the property is asserting a categorization of the described thing, 
> and I can't think of how a value qualifer fits. Did I miss some 
> discussion of this somewhere along the line?
> 
> I suggest that these should be byReference (hrefs to controlled 
> Vocabulary concepts), analogous to GeologicUnit.geologicUnitType, 
> MaterialRelation.materialRelationshipType, or 
> ParticleGeometryDescription.particleType.
> 
> steve
> 
> -- 
> Stephen M. Richard
> Arizona Geological Survey
> 416 W. Congress St., #100
> Tucson, Arizona, 85701
> USA
> phone: (520) 770-3500.  FAX: (520) 770-3505
> email: steve.richard at azgs.az.gov
> 
> _______________________________________________
> auscope-geosciml mailing list
> auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
> http://lists.arcs.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/auscope-geosciml





More information about the GeoSciML mailing list