[auscope-geosciml] problem with RockMaterial and FabricDescription

Alistair Ritchie alistair.bh.ritchie at gmail.com
Mon Aug 9 01:33:44 EDT 2010


Second (third?) that.

Alistair Ritchie
GEOSCIENCE VICTORIA | EARTH RESOURCES DIVISION
Department of Primary Industries | Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Tel: +61 3 9658 4512 | Fax: +61 3 9658 4555


On 9 August 2010 15:24, <Guillaume.Duclaux at csiro.au> wrote:

> Steve,
>
> I agree with you and IMHO all codeLists and CGI_Terms should be byReference
> and point to a controlled vocab.
>
> Cheers
>
> Gilly
> On 09/08/2010, at 1:19 PM, Stephen M Richard wrote:
>
> >  What is the logic for use of CGI_Term as the type for
> > RockMaterial.lithology or for FabricDescription.fabricType.  In both
> > cases the property is asserting a categorization of the described thing,
> > and I can't think of how a value qualifer fits. Did I miss some
> > discussion of this somewhere along the line?
> >
> > I suggest that these should be byReference (hrefs to controlled
> > Vocabulary concepts), analogous to GeologicUnit.geologicUnitType,
> > MaterialRelation.materialRelationshipType, or
> > ParticleGeometryDescription.particleType.
> >
> > steve
> >
> > --
> > Stephen M. Richard
> > Arizona Geological Survey
> > 416 W. Congress St., #100
> > Tucson, Arizona, 85701
> > USA
> > phone: (520) 770-3500.  FAX: (520) 770-3505
> > email: steve.richard at azgs.az.gov
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > auscope-geosciml mailing list
> > auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
> > http://lists.arcs.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/auscope-geosciml
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> auscope-geosciml mailing list
> auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
> http://lists.arcs.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/auscope-geosciml
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/geosciml/attachments/20100809/b7295864/attachment.htm>


More information about the GeoSciML mailing list