[auscope-geosciml] problem with RockMaterial and FabricDescription
Stephen M Richard
steve.richard at azgs.az.gov
Mon Aug 9 02:05:44 EDT 2010
Gilly--the issue is that for some term value assignments, we commonly
qualify things-- mostly well consolidated, usually red... So for value
assignments that may be qualified, we have to use CGI term, because the
'value' of the controlled concept (the term.value, which is byReference)
is modified by the qualifier (also byReference).
We need to troll through the model again carefully to make sure the use
of CGI_Term is limited to those properties where qualfiers make sense.
I just noticed GeologicFeature.observationMethod is a CGI_Term..., not
sure that makes sense.
On 8/8/2010 10:24 PM, Guillaume.Duclaux at csiro.au wrote:
> I agree with you and IMHO all codeLists and CGI_Terms should be byReference and point to a controlled vocab.
> On 09/08/2010, at 1:19 PM, Stephen M Richard wrote:
>> What is the logic for use of CGI_Term as the type for
>> RockMaterial.lithology or for FabricDescription.fabricType. In both
>> cases the property is asserting a categorization of the described thing,
>> and I can't think of how a value qualifer fits. Did I miss some
>> discussion of this somewhere along the line?
>> I suggest that these should be byReference (hrefs to controlled
>> Vocabulary concepts), analogous to GeologicUnit.geologicUnitType,
>> MaterialRelation.materialRelationshipType, or
>> Stephen M. Richard
>> Arizona Geological Survey
>> 416 W. Congress St., #100
>> Tucson, Arizona, 85701
>> phone: (520) 770-3500. FAX: (520) 770-3505
>> email: steve.richard at azgs.az.gov
>> auscope-geosciml mailing list
>> auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
> auscope-geosciml mailing list
> auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Stephen M. Richard
Arizona Geological Survey
416 W. Congress St., #100
Tucson, Arizona, 85701
phone: (520) 770-3500. FAX: (520) 770-3505
email: steve.richard at azgs.az.gov
More information about the GeoSciML