[auscope-geosciml] MappedFeature geometry [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Stephen M Richard steve.richard at azgs.az.gov
Mon Aug 9 11:13:03 EDT 2010


  So it sounds like we need to add gsml:shape back in.

On 8/9/2010 6:31 AM, Simon.Cox at csiro.au wrote:
> Yes and Yes.
> Deprecated means 'still there to support any old schemas that were already using it, but will disappear in the future so don't design any new applications to use it'.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au [mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] On Behalf Of Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au
> Sent: 09 August 2010 15:19
> To: auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
> Subject: Re: [auscope-geosciml] MappedFeature geometry [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
> I am confused. Does "gml:location is deprecated as part of the standard content model of gml:AbstractFeatureType" mean we are not supposed to use it, even though it is present in both the 3.1 and 3.2 GML schemas?  Is this why we invented gsml:shape in the first place?
>
> Ollie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au [mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] On Behalf Of Boisvert, Eric
> Sent: Monday, 9 August 2010 10:43 PM
> To: auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
> Subject: Re: [auscope-geosciml] MappedFeature geometry [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
> The only comment I have is that gml:location is deprecated
>
> > From gml 3.2 (ogc: 07-036):
>
> The value of the gml:location property describes the extent, position or relative location of the feature. gml:location is deprecated as part of the standard content model of gml:AbstractFeatureType.
>
> (it is in also gml 3.1 xsd annotations but not in gml 3.2)
>
> Eric
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au [mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] De la part de Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au Envoyé : 9 août 2010 08:36 À : auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
> Objet : Re: [auscope-geosciml] MappedFeature geometry [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
> I am sure there was no decision at Quebec or since to use gsml:MappedFeature/gml:location instead of gsml:shape (certainly no documented decision), and the absence of gsml:shape in v3 RC1 is an accident.
>
> However, looking at it now, gml:location looks like a good thing.  I can't see any reason to have gsml:shape in our model when there is a perfectly good gml attribute for us to use.
>
> Is there anyone willing to stand up for gsml:shape?  Do we need it?
>
> Perhaps gml:location may need a GeoSciML community best practice to limit data to be only GM_Object coordinate data (ie; not a location text string) to enhance interoperability?  Note that at Uppsala we took the decision to put text descriptions of borehole locations in gml:description only.
>
> Cheers,
> Ollie
>
> -----Original Message----
> From: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au [mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] On Behalf Of Sen, Marcus A
> Sent: Monday, 9 August 2010 6:21 PM
> To: auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
> Subject: Re: [auscope-geosciml] MappedFeature geometry
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au [mailto:auscope-
>> geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] On Behalf Of Boisvert, Eric
>> Sent: 06 August 2010 19:21
>> Maybe I was not paying attention in Quebec (I was indeed more
>> concentrated on dealing with Skype sound issues), but was it decided
>> to use gml:location ?
> I don't know, I couldn't hear ;-) but I've been using gml:location in the services I'm setting up.
>
> Marcus
>
> --
> This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
>
> _______________________________________________
> auscope-geosciml mailing list
> auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
> http://lists.arcs.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/auscope-geosciml
> _______________________________________________
> auscope-geosciml mailing list
> auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
> http://lists.arcs.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/auscope-geosciml
> _______________________________________________
> auscope-geosciml mailing list
> auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
> http://lists.arcs.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/auscope-geosciml
> _______________________________________________
> auscope-geosciml mailing list
> auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
> http://lists.arcs.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/auscope-geosciml
> _______________________________________________
> auscope-geosciml mailing list
> auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
> http://lists.arcs.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/auscope-geosciml
>

-- 
Stephen M. Richard
Arizona Geological Survey
416 W. Congress St., #100
Tucson, Arizona, 85701
USA
phone: (520) 770-3500.  FAX: (520) 770-3505
email: steve.richard at azgs.az.gov




More information about the GeoSciML mailing list