[Auscope-geosciml] FullMoon and GML3.3 [was CGI_Term in GeoSciMLv3.0]

Simon Cox simon.cox at jrc.ec.europa.eu
Mon Mar 22 03:36:36 EDT 2010


Else what you could do is (what I've been suggesting for a couple of years now) 
replace all 'ScopedName' attributes with 'ControlledConcept' with the tagged value inlineOrByReference='byReference'. 
That way you get exactly the same effect by fixing the model instead of buggering around with the encoding rule in advance of whatever GML does or does not. 
And its a better model as well. 
 
Simon
 

--------------------------------------------------------
Simon Cox

European Commission, Joint Research Centre 
Institute for Environment and Sustainability 
Spatial Data Infrastructures Unit, TP 262 
Via E. Fermi, 2749, I-21027 Ispra (VA), Italy 
Tel: +39 0332 78 3652 
Fax: +39 0332 78 6325 
 <mailto:simon.cox at jrc.ec.europa.eu> mailto:simon.cox at jrc.ec.europa.eu 
 <http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/simon-cox> http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/simon-cox 

SDI Unit:  <http://sdi.jrc.ec.europa.eu/> http://sdi.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ 
IES Institute:  <http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/> http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ 
JRC:  <http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/> http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/

--------------------------------------------------------

 

Any opinions expressed are personal unless otherwise indicated. 

 


  _____  

From: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au [mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] On Behalf Of Bruce.Simons at dpi.vic.gov.au
Sent: Monday, 22 March 2010 00:44
To: auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Subject: [Auscope-geosciml] FullMoon and GML3.3 [was CGI_Term in GeoSciMLv3.0]



I'm not quite following the intent here.  If preparing for the future, then fine, but GeoSciML currently uses GML3.1. With any luck it will be GML3.2 compliant by end 2010. I can't see any need to move to GML3.3 in the near future.  Is this all a little premature? 

Cheers 
Bruce

GeoScience Victoria
AuScope Grid
Australian Spatial Research Data Commons

Ph: +61-3-9658 4502
Fax: +61-3-9658 4555 
Mobile: +61 429 177155 



Létourneau, François <Francois.Letourneau at RNCan-NRCan.gc.ca> 
Sent by: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au 


17/03/2010 11:00 PM 


Please respond to
auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au



To
<auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au> 

cc

Subject
Re: [Auscope-geosciml] CGI_Term in GeoSciML v3.0 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

	




Shouldn't we apply the precaution principle and add the new classmaps tagged as GML 3.3? In Fullmoon, it is quite easy to specify which GML version to use for the encoding rules (in encoder.properties). That would require however to recreate every existing classmaps for GML 3.3 and possibly modify some of these new classmaps if other existing things change in GML 3.3 from 3.2. 
  
François 


  _____  

De : auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au [mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] De la part de Simon Cox
Envoyé : 17 mars 2010 02:57
À : Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au; auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Objet : Re: [Auscope-geosciml] CGI_Term in GeoSciML v3.0 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

First we have to have agreement on whether it is desirable to make the change now, and whether it should be in the default classmap, or a variant that we choose to use. 
If we make it to the default, it means that FullMoon would no longer be following the GML 3.2 encoding rule. 
  
Simon 
  

  _____  


From: Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au [mailto:Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au] 
Sent: 16 March 2010 22:56
To: simon.cox at jrc.ec.europa.eu; auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Cc: ryan.fraser at csiro.au
Subject: RE: [Auscope-geosciml] CGI_Term in GeoSciML v3.0 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] 
  
Hi Simon, 
  
Who is responsible for making the required changes for FullMoon? 
  
Cheers, 
Ollie 
  
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Ollie Raymond 
  
National Advice, Maps and Standards Project 
Geoscience Australia 
  
GeoSciML Design Group 
IUGS Commission for the Management and Application of Geoscience Information 
  
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Address: GPO Box 378, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia | ABN: 80 091 799 039 
Ph: +61 2 62499575 | Fax: +61 2 62499992 | Email:  <mailto:Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au> Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au |  <http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=canberra+australia&ie=UTF8&ll=-35.344028,149.158362&spn=0.007684,0.016404&t=h&z=17&iwloc=addr&om=1> Google Map 
National geological maps   <http://www.ga.gov.au/minerals/research/national/nat_maps/nat_geol_maps.jsp> http://www.ga.gov.au/minerals/research/national/nat_maps/nat_geol_maps.jsp <http://www.ga.gov.au/geoscience/national>  
Geoscience Australia web services   <http://www.ga.gov.au/resources/applications/ogc-wms.jsp> http://www.ga.gov.au/resources/applications/ogc-wms.jsp 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



 --- This message was created with 100% recycled electrons --- 
  
  
-----Original Message-----
From: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au [mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] On Behalf Of Simon Cox
Sent: Tuesday, 16 March 2010 5:59 PM
To: auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Subject: Re: [Auscope-geosciml] CGI_Term in GeoSciML v3.0 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] 
  
Breaking news: 
  
In the GML 3.3 SWG last week the issue of how to refer to an item from a controlled source consistently in GML was a hot topic. 
To summarize the conclusion I think it goes something like this: 
  
1.       items in controlled vocabularies should have URIs (codeList, controlledConcept, etc) 
a.       this does not pre-judge how they are implemented, but obviously it is RDF/SKOS/OWL- & http-friendly 
2.       Feature properties that refer to items from controlled lists (i.e. ScopedName) should be implemented using gml:ReferenceType (rather than gml:CodeType) 
a.       Xlink:href should point to the concept identifier 
b.       Xlink:title _may_ be used to provide a human-consumable label, so an interface can be built without resolving the URI 
                                                                                       i.      (obviously this is not scalable to multi-lingual labelling) 
  
This will get away from the ambiguity regarding what to put in @codeSpace and what in the element. 
  
Note that 
(a)     this is my interpretation of the discussion (I’m charged with writing it up, however) 
(b)     it has not yet been voted on, and 
(c)     would strictly only apply from GML 3.3. 
However, as it doesn’t break anything now and is a totally reasonable tweak to the UML-XML mapping rule, I suggest that GeoSciML consider using this rule now. 
  
In the FullMoon context it requires that one or more of these entries in  <https://www.seegrid.csiro.au/subversion/HollowWorld/trunk/ClassMaps/ClassMap_ISO_19103_CSL_GML32.xml> https://www.seegrid.csiro.au/subversion/HollowWorld/trunk/ClassMaps/ClassMap_ISO_19103_CSL_GML32.xml be changed: 
  
        <entry> 
               <umlClass>GenericName</umlClass> 
               <gmlObjectElement xsi:nil="true"/> 
               <gmlType xsi:nil="true"/> 
               <gmlPropertyType>gml:CodeType</gmlPropertyType> -> probably leave alone, but try not to use GenericName in models 
        </entry> 
        <entry> 
               <umlClass>LocalName</umlClass> 
               <gmlObjectElement xsi:nil="true"/> 
               <gmlType xsi:nil="true"/> 
               <gmlPropertyType>gml:CodeType</gmlPropertyType> -> this should be xs:string anyway 
        </entry> 
        <entry> 
               <umlClass>ScopedName</umlClass> 
               <gmlObjectElement xsi:nil="true"/> 
               <gmlType xsi:nil="true"/> 
               <gmlPropertyType>gml:CodeWithAuthorityType</gmlPropertyType> -> change to gml:ReferenceType 
        </entry> 
  
Simon 


  _____  


From: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au [mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] On Behalf Of Alistair Ritchie
Sent: 16 March 2010 00:52
To: auscope-geosciml
Subject: Re: [Auscope-geosciml] CGI_Term in GeoSciML v3.0 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] 
  
How do I send a nice red face? Yes: 'qualifier on CGI_Term'. Thanks for that.

If it's an attribute I'm pretty confident that's how it would encode, if it is an element I'm a bit confused:

<gsml:lithology codeSpace="urn:cgi:classifierScheme:CGI:SimpleLithology:200811">
    urn:cgi:classifierScheme:CGI:SimpleLithology:200811
    <gsml:qualifier>sometimes</gsml:qualifier>
</gsml:lithology>

Seems nasty.

WRT your question: I'm not Full Moon expert but I would have expected you woul use a Tagged Value to define an attribute.

Alistair Ritchie
GEOSCIENCE VICTORIA | EARTH RESOURCES DIVISION
Department of Primary Industries | Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Tel: +61 3 9658 4512 | Fax: +61 3 9658 4555 
On 16 March 2010 10:00, < <mailto:Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au> Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au> wrote: 
Hi Alistair, 
  
Re question 1.   Ah, you mean why is ‘qualifier’ mandatory in CGI_Term?   I think it is just an oversight.  As far as I can tell, there was no discussion of this point at Quebec?  Probably should be optional like in v2.0.   
  
Re question 2.   Hmm, not exactly sure how this would encode.  Your attempt is as good as I could do. 
  
As a related question... In the UML, I have never known how to make an attribute occur in the schema as an attribute within the tag (like qualifier=”sometimes”), rather than as an attribute between the tags (like <qualifier>sometimes</qualifier>).  eg; swe:AbstractDataComponent encodes its attributes within its element tag, but I can’t see anything in the UML which makes it different to swe:Quantity which encodes its attributes outside the element tag. 
  

  
<swe:Quantity definition="urn:test:xxx" fixed="false"> 
            <swe:uom xlink:href="#ppm"/> 
            <swe:value>23.6</swe:value> 
</swe:Quantity> 
  
Any ideas? 
  
Cheers, 
Ollie 
  
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Ollie Raymond 
  
National Advice, Maps and Standards Project 
Geoscience Australia 
  
GeoSciML Design Group 
IUGS Commission for the Management and Application of Geoscience Information 
  
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Address: GPO Box 378, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia | ABN: 80 091 799 039 
Ph: +61 2 62499575 | Fax: +61 2 62499992 | Email:  <mailto:Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au> Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au |  <http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=canberra+australia&ie=UTF8&ll=-35.344028,149.158362&spn=0.007684,0.016404&t=h&z=17&iwloc=addr&om=1> Google Map 
National geological maps   <http://www.ga.gov.au/minerals/research/national/nat_maps/nat_geol_maps.jsp> http://www.ga.gov.au/minerals/research/national/nat_maps/nat_geol_maps.jsp <http://www.ga.gov.au/geoscience/national>  
Geoscience Australia web services   <http://www.ga.gov.au/resources/applications/ogc-wms.jsp> http://www.ga.gov.au/resources/applications/ogc-wms.jsp 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



 --- This message was created with 100% recycled electrons --- 
  
  
-----Original Message-----
From:  <mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au> auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au [mailto: <mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au> auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] On Behalf Of Alistair Ritchie 
Sent: Tuesday, 16 March 2010 8:59 AM
To: auscope-geosciml
Subject: Re: [Auscope-geosciml] CGI_Term in GeoSciML v3.0 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] 
  
Hi Ollie

The email address is registered and I've been using it since last year. Odd.

Is it an attribute like codeSpace? Would it encode as:

<gsml:lithology codeSpace="urn:cgi:classifierScheme:CGI:SimpleLithology:200811" qualifier="sometimes">
    urn:cgi:classifierScheme:CGI:SimpleLithology:200811</gsml:lithology>

Cheers

Alistair Ritchie
GEOSCIENCE VICTORIA | EARTH RESOURCES DIVISION
Department of Primary Industries | Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Tel: +61 3 9658 4512 | Fax: +61 3 9658 4555 
On 16 March 2010 08:45, < <mailto:Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au> Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au> wrote: 
Hi Alistair, 
  
I think your email to the list bounced - your gmail account is probably not registered with the list. 
  
Could you rephrase question 2?  Doesn’t make sense to me. 
  
Cheers, 
Ollie 
  
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Ollie Raymond 
  
National Advice, Maps and Standards Project 
Geoscience Australia 
  
GeoSciML Design Group 
IUGS Commission for the Management and Application of Geoscience Information 
  
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Address: GPO Box 378, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia | ABN: 80 091 799 039 
Ph: +61 2 62499575 | Fax: +61 2 62499992 | Email:  <mailto:Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au> Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au |  <http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=canberra+australia&ie=UTF8&ll=-35.344028,149.158362&spn=0.007684,0.016404&t=h&z=17&iwloc=addr&om=1> Google Map 
National geological maps   <http://www.ga.gov.au/minerals/research/national/nat_maps/nat_geol_maps.jsp> http://www.ga.gov.au/minerals/research/national/nat_maps/nat_geol_maps.jsp <http://www.ga.gov.au/geoscience/national>  
Geoscience Australia web services   <http://www.ga.gov.au/resources/applications/ogc-wms.jsp> http://www.ga.gov.au/resources/applications/ogc-wms.jsp 


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



 --- This message was created with 100% recycled electrons --- 
  
  
-----Original Message-----
From:  <mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au> auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au [mailto: <mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au> auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] On Behalf Of Alistair Ritchie
Sent: Monday, 15 March 2010 5:20 PM
To: AuScope-GeoSciML
Subject: [Auscope-geosciml] CGI_Term in GeoSciML v3.0 
  
Hi Everyone

Quick and easy questions concerning the new CGI_Term in GeoSciML 3.0: 
1.      Why is it mandatory? 
2.      Is it an attribute of CGI_Term? 
Cheers
Alistair

Alistair Ritchie
GEOSCIENCE VICTORIA | EARTH RESOURCES DIVISION
Department of Primary Industries | Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Tel: +61 3 9658 4512 | Fax: +61 3 9658 4555 

_______________________________________________
Auscope-geosciml mailing list
 <mailto:Auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au> Auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
 <http://lists.arcs.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/auscope-geosciml> http://lists.arcs.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/auscope-geosciml 
  

_______________________________________________
Auscope-geosciml mailing list
 <mailto:Auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au> Auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
 <http://lists.arcs.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/auscope-geosciml> http://lists.arcs.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/auscope-geosciml 
 _______________________________________________
Auscope-geosciml mailing list
Auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
http://lists.arcs.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/auscope-geosciml

<S�M��x���؉�

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/geosciml/attachments/20100322/008d2a97/attachment.htm>


More information about the GeoSciML mailing list