[auscope-geosciml] RE : BoreholeDetails in GeoSciMLv3 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Boisvert, Eric Eric.Boisvert at RNCan-NRCan.gc.ca
Tue Oct 26 05:03:46 EDT 2010



De: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au de la part de Laxton, John L
Date: mar. 2010-10-26 04:19
À: auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Objet : Re: [auscope-geosciml] BoreholeDetails in GeoSciMLv3 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Likewise - this is the most flexible.




From: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au [mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] On Behalf Of Bruce.Simons at dpi.vic.gov.au
Sent: 26 October 2010 06:13
To: auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Subject: Re: [auscope-geosciml] BoreholeDetails in GeoSciML v3 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


My preference is for In-Line or byReference where possible. 
And then use profiles to indicate which is best practice for a specific community/application. 

Bruce Simons

Ph: +61-3-9658 4502
Fax: +61-3-9658 4555 
Mobile: +61 429 177155 

From:        <Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au> 
To:        <auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au> 
Date:        26/10/2010 03:53 PM 
Subject:        [auscope-geosciml] BoreholeDetails in GeoSciML v3 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] 
Sent by:        auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au 


Just cleaning up some last minute details in the model.... 
The BoreholeDetails class contains several ISO19115 attributes (ie; CI_ResponsibleParty) which have always been tagged as byReference due to our inability to access the ISO19115 schemas which require GML3.2.   
Now that we are generating a GML3.2-capable GeoSciML schema, do we still want these ISO19115 attributes as byReference only?  (My personal preference is to allow them to be inline) 
Votes please? 
auscope-geosciml mailing list
auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
http://lists.arcs.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/auscope-geosciml <http://lists.arcs.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/auscope-geosciml> 

This email and any attachments may contain information that is personal, confidential,
legally privileged and/or copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the prior written consent of the copyright owner. 

It is the responsibility of the recipient to check for and remove viruses.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return email, delete it from your system and destroy any copies. You are not authorised to use, communicate or rely on the information contained in this email.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.




This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC 
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents 
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless 
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to 
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system. 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 33038 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/geosciml/attachments/20101026/bc93c21c/attachment.bin>

More information about the GeoSciML mailing list