[auscope-geosciml] RE : RE : EarthMaterial package [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Boisvert, Eric Eric.Boisvert at RNCan-NRCan.gc.ca
Wed Oct 27 05:30:43 EDT 2010

My point is that it can be done without having multiple namespaces, it just compartimentation of the xsd files structure in such a way that you can import a xsd while ignoring the others.
Or am I missing something again ?.


De: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au de la part de Rob.Atkinson at csiro.au
Date: mer. 2010-10-27 05:20
À: auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Objet : Re: [auscope-geosciml] RE : EarthMaterial package [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

you can reuse part of a model (or a schema) without being affected by every change in any related part (encapsulation). Hopefuly we can get to the point where the core model is stable and we are adding new modules or improving specific aspects. This means namespaces - since we have one per application schema.

We will just need tools to help us building configurations - humans dont buold instances - so more namespaces isnt such a problem in reality is it?


From: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au [auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] On Behalf Of Boisvert, Eric [Eric.Boisvert at RNCan-NRCan.gc.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, 27 October 2010 8:04 PM
To: auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Subject: [auscope-geosciml] RE : EarthMaterial package [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

what's the benefit of having many namespaces again ?

De: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au de la part de Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au
Date: mar. 2010-10-26 22:09
À: auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Objet : [auscope-geosciml] EarthMaterial package [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Hi all,

The v3 RC2 model is on the verge of schema generation.

Simon mentioned in passing to me that we might consider extracting the EarthMaterial leaf package out of the quite large GeoSciML-Core package and into its own Application Schema.

As far as I can see, this would not introduce any dependency problems (GeoSciML-Core schema would just import the EarthMaterial schema), and it would be a fairly simple thing to implement even at this late stage in v3 RC2.

Could I get feedback from everyone about whether they think this is a good idea.


Ollie Raymond

National Advice, Maps and Data Standards Project
Geoscience Australia

GeoSciML Design Group
IUGS Commission for the Management and Application of Geoscience Information
Interoperability Working Group


Address: GPO Box 378, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia | ABN: 80 091 799 039
Ph: +61 2 62499575 | Fax: +61 2 62499992 | Email: Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au<mailto:Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au> | Google Map<http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=canberra+australia&ie=UTF8&ll=-35.344028,149.158362&spn=0.007684,0.016404&t=h&z=17&iwloc=addr&om=1>
National geological maps  http://www.ga.gov.au/minerals/research/national/nat_maps/nat_geol_maps.jsp
Geoscience Australia web services  http://www.ga.gov.au/resources/applications/ogc-wms.jsp

 --- This message was created with 100% recycled electrons ---

auscope-geosciml mailing list
auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au

More information about the GeoSciML mailing list