Laxton, John L
jll at bgs.ac.uk
Wed Sep 8 11:24:30 EDT 2010
They were wanting a modified version of Folk (slightly muddy sand etc). It would be the ParticleGeometryDescription of EarthMaterial but on reflection this might be best handled as lithology terms - it's a bit of a grey area as to what is a description of lithology and what is a description of size....
From: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au [mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] On Behalf Of Boisvert, Eric
Sent: 08 September 2010 16:07
To: auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Subject: Re: [auscope-geosciml] ParticleGeometryDescription
would these terms be "sand, silt, mud, clay" etc.. ?
I remember a discussion with Bruce Johnson and Boyan Brodaric where is was argued that these terms are actually EarthMaterial.
De : auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au [mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] De la part de Laxton, John L
Envoyé : 8 septembre 2010 11:04
À : auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Objet : [auscope-geosciml] ParticleGeometryDescription
A project for distributing marine geological data which is looking at using GeoSciML wants to be able to use terms to describe particle size. Could we add another attribute to ParticleGeometryDescription to allow for this: sizeTerm CGI_Term [0..1]? I think we discussed this briefly in Rome but with no conclusion....
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the GeoSciML