[auscope-geosciml] Sequence of Events

Bruce.Simons at dpi.vic.gov.au Bruce.Simons at dpi.vic.gov.au
Fri Apr 15 00:39:31 EDT 2011

Hi John,
Sorry for the delay but I've been trying to get the instance documents to 
validate in order to produce an example (without success so far - so no 
example produced).

> Surely GeologicFeatureRelation is describing the relationship between 
two GeologicFeatures, not two GeologicEvents applying to the same 

The two GeologicEvents are two GeologicFeatures that relate to the same 
GeologicUnit (they may also relate to other GeologicUnits). The 
GeologicFeaturerelation is describing the relationship between these two 
events in terms of the enclosing GeologicUnit.  The following captures 

                <gsml:GeologicEvent gml:id="Event 1">
                <gsml:GeologicEvent gml:id="Event2">
                                <gsml:GeologicFeatureRelation gml:id="
                                        <gsml:relationship codeSpace="
http=URI for event relationships">Preceding Event</gsml:relationship>
                                        <gsml:sourceRole codeSpace="
http-URI for event roles">precedes</gsml:sourceRole>
                                        <gsml:targetRole codeSpace="
http-URI for event roles">succeeds</gsml:targetRole>
                                        <gsml:target xlink:href="Event 
                                        <gsml:source xlink:href="Event 

Ideally the relationship between the GeologicEvents external to the 
GeologicUnit would be consistent with the relationship between the 
GeologicEvents within the GeologicUnit.

So an alternative is to describe the relationships between all the 
GeologicEvents (a GeologicEvent WFS) and then refer to these byReference 
from within the GeologicUnit (this would need testing).

Of course neither adequately covers specifying the ordering of 
GeologicEvents, which it should, but was left out as being too hard in 


Bruce Simons
Senior Information Geoscientist
IUGS-Commission for Geoscience Information Oceania Councillor
GeoScience Victoria/Australian Spatial Research Data Commons
Level 9, 55 Collins St
PO Box 4440
Melbourne, Victoria, 3001

Ph: +61-3-9658 4502
Fax: +61-3-9658 4555
Mobile: +61 429 177155

From:   "Laxton, John L." <jll at bgs.ac.uk>
To:     "auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au" 
<auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au>
Date:   08/04/2011 09:04 PM
Subject:        [auscope-geosciml] Sequence of Events
Sent by:        auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au

There is a note attached to GeologicEvent in the model stating that the 
sequence of GeologicEvents can be handled with GeologicFeatureRelation. 
I’m not quite clear how this will work. Surely GeologicFeatureRelation is 
describing the relationship between two GeologicFeatures, not two 
GeologicEvents applying to the same GeologicFeature? Do we not need a 
GeologicEventRelation subtype of GeologicRelation with source/target links 
to GeologicEvent?
John Laxton
British Geological Survey
Murchison House
West Mains Rd
Edinburgh, EH9 3LA
United Kingdom

Tel: +44 (0)131 667 1000
Fax: +44 (0)131 668 1535
email: jll at bgs.ac.uk
Web site: www.bgs.ac.uk
Internet Shop: www.thebgs.co.uk 

This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC 
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents 
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless 
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to 
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
auscope-geosciml mailing list
auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/geosciml/attachments/20110415/23212767/attachment.htm>

More information about the GeoSciML mailing list