[auscope-geosciml] GeoSciML v3.0 instance documents top feature?
Stephen Richard
steve.richard at azgs.az.gov
Wed Aug 31 18:33:52 EDT 2011
Namespace abbreviations are scoped to the document within which they are
declared. The WFS filter processor should be namespace aware, so it would
resolve the abbreviation before comparing feature names. It shouldn't make
any difference. Only reason to have convention is it makes it easier for
people to read the xml, but that's not supposed to go on very much.
steve
Stephen M. Richard
Arizona Geological Survey
416 W. Congress St., #100
Tucson, Arizona, 85701 USA
phone: 520 209-4127
AZGS Main: (520) 770-3500. FAX: (520) 770-3505
email: steve.richard at azgs.az.gov
From: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au
[mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] On Behalf Of
Bruce.Simons at dpi.vic.gov.au
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 3:14 PM
To: auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Subject: Re: [auscope-geosciml] GeoSciML v3.0 instance documents top
feature?
Hi all,
Gilly has proposed the following namespaces:
xmlns:gsml=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeoSciML-Core/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeoSciML-Core/3.0"
xmlns:cgu=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Utilities/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Utilities/3.0"
xmlns:gt=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicTime/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicTime/3.0"
xmlns:gbh=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Borehole/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Borehole/3.0"
xmlns:glab="
<http://xmlns.geosciml.org/LaboratoryAnalysis-Specimen/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/LaboratoryAnalysis-Specimen/3.0"
xmlns:gpp=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/PhysicalProperties/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/PhysicalProperties/3.0"
xmlns:trs=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/TemporalReferenceSystem/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/TemporalReferenceSystem/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlc=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Collection/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Collection/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlem=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/EarthMaterial/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/EarthMaterial/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlga=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicAge/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicAge/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlgm=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Geomorphology/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Geomorphology/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlgu=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicUnit/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicUnit/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlst=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicStructure/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicStructure/3.0"
Firstly, for consistency and uniqueness purposes, shouldn't we use:
xmlns:gsml30=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeoSciML-Core/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeoSciML-Core/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlcgu=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Utilities/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Utilities/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlgt=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicTime/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicTime/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlbh=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Borehole/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Borehole/3.0"
xmlns:gsmllab="
<http://xmlns.geosciml.org/LaboratoryAnalysis-Specimen/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/LaboratoryAnalysis-Specimen/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlpp=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/PhysicalProperties/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/PhysicalProperties/3.0"
xmlns:trs=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/TemporalReferenceSystem/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/TemporalReferenceSystem/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlc=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Collection/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Collection/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlem=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/EarthMaterial/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/EarthMaterial/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlga=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicAge/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicAge/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlgm=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Geomorphology/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Geomorphology/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlgu=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicUnit/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicUnit/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlgs=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicStructure/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicStructure/3.0"
Secondly, for query purposes, do we have to agree on these namespace
abbreviations as part of the GeoSciML v3 profile? If I use gsmlgs and others
use gsmlst for " <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeoSciML-Core/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicStructure/3.0" then can a request to both
services for 'Contact" be made, and if so is it only if the full namespace
is included in the request?
If we have to agree on the abbreviations then this will need to be formally
documented.
Cheers
Bruce Simons
----------------------------------------------------
Senior Information Systems Analyst
Prospectivity & Exploration, Earth Resources Development Division
IUGS-Commission for Geoscience Information Oceania Councillor
Level 9, 55 Collins St
PO Box 4440
Melbourne, Victoria, 3001
Australia
Ph: +61-3-9658 4502
Fax: +61-3-9658 4555
Mobile: +61 429 177155
From: <Guillaume.Duclaux at csiro.au>
To: <auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au>
Date: 24/08/2011 11:13 PM
Subject: [auscope-geosciml] GeoSciML v3.0 instance documents top
feature?
Sent by: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au
_____
Hi folks,
Could one of the WFS guru advised me on (1) what version of WFS, and (2)
what top feature should be used for drafting the instance doc?
<wfs:FeatureCollection> seems to be the most common top feature in the
instance doc available here (
<https://www.seegrid.csiro.au/subversion/GeoSciML/branches/3.0.0/instances/>
https://www.seegrid.csiro.au/subversion/GeoSciML/branches/3.0.0/instances/),
or should we use a <gsmlc:Collection>, or something else?
If you're looking for them, here is the list of all the GeoSciML v.3.0
namespaces:
xmlns:gsml=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeoSciML-Core/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeoSciML-Core/3.0"
xmlns:cgu=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Utilities/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Utilities/3.0"
xmlns:gt=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicTime/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicTime/3.0"
xmlns:gbh=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Borehole/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Borehole/3.0"
xmlns:glab="
<http://xmlns.geosciml.org/LaboratoryAnalysis-Specimen/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/LaboratoryAnalysis-Specimen/3.0"
xmlns:gpp=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/PhysicalProperties/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/PhysicalProperties/3.0"
xmlns:trs=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/TemporalReferenceSystem/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/TemporalReferenceSystem/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlc=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Collection/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Collection/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlem=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/EarthMaterial/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/EarthMaterial/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlga=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicAge/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicAge/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlgm=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Geomorphology/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Geomorphology/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlgu=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicUnit/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicUnit/3.0"
xmlns:gsmlst=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicStructure/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicStructure/3.0"
and the schema location associated to each namespace is as follow:
namespace=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Utilities/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Utilities/3.0"
schemaLocation="
<http://schemas.geosciml.org/cgiutilities/3.0/cgiUtilities.xsd>
http://schemas.geosciml.org/cgiutilities/3.0/cgiUtilities.xsd"
namespace=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeoSciML-Core/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeoSciML-Core/3.0"
schemaLocation="
<http://schemas.geosciml.org/geosciml-core/3.0/geosciml-core.xsd>
http://schemas.geosciml.org/geosciml-core/3.0/geosciml-core.xsd"
namespace=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicTime/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicTime/3.0"
schemaLocation=" <http://schemas.geosciml.org/geotime/3.0/geologicTime.xsd>
http://schemas.geosciml.org/geotime/3.0/geologicTime.xsd"
namespace=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Borehole/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Borehole/3.0"
schemaLocation=" <http://schemas.geosciml.org/borehole/3.0/borehole.xsd>
http://schemas.geosciml.org/borehole/3.0/borehole.xsd"
namespace=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/LaboratoryAnalysis-Specimen/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/LaboratoryAnalysis-Specimen/3.0"
schemaLocation="
<http://schemas.geosciml.org/laboratoryanalysis-specimen/3.0/laboratoryAnaly
sis-Specimen.xsd>
http://schemas.geosciml.org/laboratoryanalysis-specimen/3.0/laboratoryAnalys
is-Specimen.xsd"
namespace=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/PhysicalProperties/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/PhysicalProperties/3.0"
schemaLocation="
<http://schemas.geosciml.org/physicalproperties/3.0/physicalProperties.xsd>
http://schemas.geosciml.org/physicalproperties/3.0/physicalProperties.xsd"
namespace=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/TemporalReferenceSystem/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/TemporalReferenceSystem/3.0"
schemaLocation="
<http://schemas.geosciml.org/temporalreferencesystem/3.0/trs.xsd>
http://schemas.geosciml.org/temporalreferencesystem/3.0/trs.xsd"
namespace=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Collection/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Collection/3.0"
schemaLocation=" <http://schemas.geosciml.org/collection/3.0/collection.xsd>
http://schemas.geosciml.org/collection/3.0/collection.xsd"
namespace=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/EarthMaterial/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/EarthMaterial/3.0"
schemaLocation="
<http://schemas.geosciml.org/earthmaterial/3.0/earthMaterial.xsd>
http://schemas.geosciml.org/earthmaterial/3.0/earthMaterial.xsd"
namespace=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicAge/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicAge/3.0"
schemaLocation="
<http://schemas.geosciml.org/geologicage/3.0/geologicAge.xsd>
http://schemas.geosciml.org/geologicage/3.0/geologicAge.xsd"
namespace=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicStructure/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicStructure/3.0"
schemaLocation="
<http://schemas.geosciml.org/geologicstructure/3.0/geologicStructure.xsd>
http://schemas.geosciml.org/geologicstructure/3.0/geologicStructure.xsd"
namespace=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicUnit/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/GeologicUnit/3.0"
schemaLocation="
<http://schemas.geosciml.org/geologicunit/3.0/geologicUnit.xsd>
http://schemas.geosciml.org/geologicunit/3.0/geologicUnit.xsd"
namespace=" <http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Geomorphology/3.0>
http://xmlns.geosciml.org/Geomorphology/3.0"
schemaLocation="
<http://schemas.geosciml.org/geomorphology/3.0/geomorphology.xsd>
http://schemas.geosciml.org/geomorphology/3.0/geomorphology.xsd"
Cheers
Gilly
Dr Guillaume Duclaux
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
guillaume.duclaux at csiro.au< <mailto:guillaume.duclaux at csiro.au>
mailto:guillaume.duclaux at csiro.au>
Address: Australian Resources Research Centre, 26 Dick Perry Avenue,
Kensington WA 6151
_______________________________________________
auscope-geosciml mailing list
auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
<http://lists.arcs.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/auscope-geosciml>
http://lists.arcs.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/auscope-geosciml
Notice:
This email and any attachments may contain information that is personal,
confidential,
legally privileged and/or copyright. No part of it should be reproduced,
adapted or communicated without the prior written consent of the copyright
owner.
It is the responsibility of the recipient to check for and remove viruses.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return
email, delete it from your system and destroy any copies. You are not
authorised to use, communicate or rely on the information contained in this
email.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/geosciml/attachments/20110831/b4dd393a/attachment.htm>
More information about the GeoSciML
mailing list