[auscope-geosciml] RE : Use Cases
Eric.Boisvert at RNCan-NRCan.gc.ca
Tue Jun 21 05:17:13 EDT 2011
Agree. We did better in TB3 (In my opinion) because we commited to implement very specific use cases and tried to implement the same (so we were actually forced to converge).
De: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au de la part de Sen, Marcus A.
Date: mar. 2011-06-21 04:04
À: auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Objet : [auscope-geosciml] Use Cases
> -----Original Message-----
> From: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au [mailto:auscope-
> geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] On Behalf Of Simon.Cox at csiro.au
> Sent: 21 June 2011 05:07
> To: auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
> IMHO that requires you to be very very clear about the use-cases.
That's always been a weak point of our efforts. Perhaps this should be added to the Edinburgh agenda?
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
auscope-geosciml mailing list
auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 4734 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the GeoSciML