[auscope-geosciml] CGI_Term/value should be nillable?

Laxton, John L. jll at bgs.ac.uk
Fri Jun 24 06:02:04 EDT 2011

I don't see how value can be nillable as that is the principal information CGI_Term is delivering. There has been no decision yet on the future of CGI_Value and its children as far as I am aware - I think this is one of the things that needs to be decided in Edinburgh.


-----Original Message-----
From: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au [mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] On Behalf Of Sen, Marcus A.
Sent: 24 June 2011 10:56
To: auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Subject: [auscope-geosciml] CGI_Term/value should be nillable?

Should CGI_Term/value be made nillable? 

(If we're still using it at all; I haven't followed the emails closely enough to remember whether CGI_Term is going to be replaced or not.)


This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
auscope-geosciml mailing list
auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au

More information about the GeoSciML mailing list