[auscope-geosciml] GeologicEvent and GeologicFeature

Alistair Ritchie alistair.bh.ritchie at gmail.com
Thu May 5 06:19:06 EDT 2011


You would have to replace the geologicHistory association with a relationship defined using GeologicFeatureRelationship, yes?

This would allow semantic richness using the role properties on the relationship class.


On 05/05/2011, at 19:45, "Sen, Marcus A." <mase at bgs.ac.uk> wrote:

> If GeologicEvent is made a GeologicFeature will it still be appropriate to have the geologicHistory property included as a property of GeologicFeature?
> 
> Other properties currently in GeologicFeature but not GeologicEvent are:
> 
> observationMethod - guess that is applicable to a GeologicEvent as well
> purpose - can this apply to a GeologicEvent?
> occurrence - Seems to make sense as e.g. mapping location of epicentre of an earthquake. Distinct from the mapped features delimiting e.g. GeologicUnits that have been affected by certain GeologicEvents.
> targetLink - the property that people want on GeologicEvent that started the discussion
> 
> (classifier and metadata properties are defined separately for both feature types.)
> 
> Marcus
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
> is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
> of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
> it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
> NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
> _______________________________________________
> auscope-geosciml mailing list
> auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
> http://lists.arcs.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/auscope-geosciml



More information about the GeoSciML mailing list