[auscope-geosciml] [ExternalEmail] Re: 34th IGC - abstract for GeoSciML v3 - for comment [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Stephen M Richard steve.richard at azgs.az.gov
Mon Feb 6 13:45:25 EST 2012


Also, the CGI IWG + submitting author is the authorship I've used on
abstracts for GSA and AGU, I think it's a good approach.

steve

 

Stephen M. Richard

Arizona Geological Survey

416 W. Congress St., #100

Tucson, Arizona, 85701   USA

phone: 520 209-4127

AZGS Main: (520) 770-3500.  FAX: (520) 770-3505

email: steve.richard at azgs.az.gov

 

From: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au
[mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] On Behalf Of Laxton,
John L.
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 8:26 AM
To: auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Subject: Re: [auscope-geosciml] [ExternalEmail] Re: 34th IGC - abstract for
GeoSciML v3 - for comment [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

Folks,

 

This draft looks good to me - just a couple of points:

 

1.      Is it worth mentioning in a sentence at the end the exemplar
database that Alastair/Bruce have developed? Something like: 'An exemplar
database has been developed to assist with model testing and
implementation'.

2.      In terms of the author list I am inclined to agree with Jean-Jacques
that the best might be Ollie and the  "CGI-IUGS Interoperability Working
Group" (maybe followed by the CGI web site link:http://www.cgi-iugs.org/.
This reduces the number of authors and is a bit more inclusive - but I
appreciate this might cause problems for those in citation fixated
organizations!

 

John

 

From: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au
[mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] On Behalf Of
Bruce.Simons at csiro.au
Sent: 02 February 2012 23:14
To: auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Subject: Re: [auscope-geosciml] [ExternalEmail] Re: 34th IGC - abstract for
GeoSciML v3 - for comment [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

Sorry.

Somehow I attached an earlier draft of the abstract I was playing with.

The correct one now attached!

 

From: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au
[mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] On Behalf Of
Bruce.Simons at csiro.au
Sent: Friday, 3 February 2012 9:50 AM
To: auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Subject: [ExternalEmail] Re: [auscope-geosciml] 34th IGC - abstract for
GeoSciML v3 - for comment [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

Hi Ollie,

Attached is a draft with some suggested minor corrections to the text.

At the risk of offending Jouni  I have suggested a change of authorship.  

Although Jouni was at the Edinburgh meeting my feeling is that Jouni has
been more involved in getting EarthResouirceML2 up, rather than GeoSciML 3.
As such he is (hopefully) submitting a separate abstract on that to the IGC.

Along with others no longer on the authorship list, Simon has been crucial
in getting us to where we are now. Although Simon was not at the past few
IWG meetings, I believe he was the instigator and driver behind the GeoSciML
3 refactoring and move to GML 3.2. 

 

Although it may mean some contributions are not recognised, I would prefer
to see an actual author list rather than use the "CGI Interoperability
Working Group" (purely a reflection of my move to CSIRO and its focus on
citations!!).

 

Cheers

Bruce

From: auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au
[mailto:auscope-geosciml-bounces at lists.arcs.org.au] On Behalf Of
Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au
Sent: Thursday, 2 February 2012 5:52 PM
To: auscope-geosciml at lists.arcs.org.au
Subject: [auscope-geosciml] 34th IGC - abstract for GeoSciML v3 - for
comment [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

Hi all,

 

Please find attached a proposed GeoSciML v3 abstract for 34th IGC - for
comments please.  I have added a one-liner about submission to OGC.

 

The abstract is a severely pared-down version of the 400-word EGU conference
abstract.  IGC limits are only 250 words and 1500 characters, although I
have had discussions with the conference organisers here in Canberra about
the very unrealistic mismatch between 250 words and 1500 characters.  The
attached abstract is 241 words but is over 1700 characters - I think they
forgot that scientists use big words.  I anticipate that the character limit
may be amended on the conference website very soon.

 

Another issue is the author list.  The IGC have a 10 author limit.  As a
result, I have already pared the author list a bit without losing agency
representation but I might be forced to cull more.  Should we submit it as
author = "CGI-IUGS Interoperability Working Group"?

 

Cheers,

Ollie

 

_______________________________________________________________________

 

Ollie Raymond

 

Section Leader

 
<http://www.ga.gov.au/minerals/projects/current-projects/geological-maps-sta
ndards.html> National Geological Maps and Data Standards Section

Geoscience Australia

 

 <https://www.seegrid.csiro.au/wiki/bin/view/CGIModel/InteroperabilityWG>
Interoperability Working Group

IUGS Commission for the Management and Application of Geoscience Information

 

Address: GPO Box 378, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia | ABN: 80 091 799 039

Ph: +61 2 62499575 | Fax: +61 2 62499917 | Email:
<mailto:oliver.raymond at ga.gov.au> oliver.raymond at ga.gov.au |
<http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=canberra+australia&ie=UTF8
&ll=-35.344028,149.158362&spn=0.007684,0.016404&t=h&z=17&iwloc=addr&om=1>
Google Map 

_______________________________________________________________________

 

--- This message was created with 100% recycled electrons ---

 


-- 
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC 
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents 
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless 
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to 
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/geosciml/attachments/20120206/5dacd1e5/attachment.htm>


More information about the GeoSciML mailing list