[auscope-geosciml] FW: OneGeology Schematron rules

Steve Richard steve.richard at azgs.az.gov
Wed May 23 13:19:12 EDT 2012

Can we update the schematron rules to use the 201202 versions of the
vocabularies, and put them in the 3.0.0 tag?  Has anybody tested them?



From: Clemens Portele [mailto:portele at interactive-instruments.de] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 7:38 AM
To: Boisvert, Eric
Cc: steve.richard at azgs.az.gov; Oliver.Raymond at ga.gov.au; jll at bgs.ac.uk
Laxton; Serrano Jean-Jacques; Ian Jackson; Geoff Wade; Satish Sankaran;
Roberto Lucchi
Subject: Re: OneGeology Schematron rules


Thanks, my understanding was that anything in the 3.0.0 branch would be
untested/inofficial and only those in the 3.0.0 tag would be official. Maybe
we should confirm with Tim which rules they are using in the clients. Should
I do this?


>From the two Schematron files the right one is probably
eoSciML_v3_Testbed_4.sch. Correct?


Does this mean that we have to use the 201012 vocabulary instead of the
201202 one as this includes URIs with numeric codes, e.g.


Is my understanding correct that we will not have any Chronostratigraphic
units or Deformation units? Both have assertions that require relatedFeature
properties and as far as I can see these are not part of the profile we have





Am 23.05.2012 um 15:50 schrieb Boisvert, Eric:

AFAIK, these
) are the rules written in Edinburgh last summer 


I'm not aware of any other schematron files.






-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/geosciml/attachments/20120523/fbed1d43/attachment.htm>

More information about the GeoSciML mailing list