Laxton, John L. jll at bgs.ac.uk
Mon Oct 8 18:09:24 EDT 2012

Hi Dale,

I think the resolutionScale property of MappedFeature is the only thing we have done along those lines.


From: geosciml-bounces+jll=bgs.ac.uk at lists.opengeospatial.org [geosciml-bounces+jll=bgs.ac.uk at lists.opengeospatial.org] On Behalf Of Dale.Percival at ga.gov.au [Dale.Percival at ga.gov.au]
Sent: 08 October 2012 21:50
To: geosciml at lists.opengeospatial.org

Hi everyone,

I was at a presentation yesterday of CityGML where the concept of levels of detail has been incorporated into their model and was wondering if we had considered anything similar? Their concept is that different application of delivered data is used for different purposes so that each level is progressively more detailed ranging from aerial imagery of a city through to indoor  navigation. Not sure it fits in the geology context but it seems to be something we have wrestled with and one reason why the model has become as complex as it has.


Geoscience Australia Disclaimer: This e-mail (and files transmitted with it) is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, then you have received this e-mail by mistake and any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail and its file attachments is prohibited. The security of emails transmitted cannot be guaranteed; by forwarding or replying to this email, you acknowledge and accept these risks.
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/geosciml/attachments/20121008/bfe0457f/attachment.htm>

More information about the GeoSciML mailing list