[GeoSciML] circular dependencies Basic-Extension

Boisvert, Eric Eric.Boisvert at RNCan-NRCan.gc.ca
Tue Apr 21 12:35:50 EDT 2015

Yep, I'm still cleaning stuff in the model and I took note of the package dependency issue (there none left in the model itself).  I use ShapeChange to generate the XSD (another learning curve) and it reports issues that I fix as I go (I spent some times with Basic to learn how ShapeChange works). I'm still trying to understand why basic keeps including both SWE 1.0 and SWE 2.0 (and SWE 1.0 without any schemaLocation)

>have you been using 'SolidGround' to update the package dependency diagram

Nope, do you recommender I use it ?

De : GeoSciML [mailto:geosciml-bounces+eric.boisvert=rncan-nrcan.gc.ca at lists.opengeospatial.org] De la part de Steve Richard
Envoyé : April 21, 2015 12:26
À : A mailing list for GeoSciML (geosciml at lists.opengeospatial.org)
Objet : [GeoSciML] circular dependencies Basic-Extension

Eric-- have you been using 'SolidGround' to update the package dependency diagrams as you clean up the implementation model for v4 in trunk?

the Dependency diagram in GeoSciMLBasic is showing circular dependencies with GeoSciMLExtension. There should be no dependency of Basic on Extension. I don't want to delve into it if you're working on things. Let me know if I should investigate.


Stephen Richard

Chief Geoinformatics Section

Arizona Geological Survey

416 E. Congress #100, Tucson 85745

steve.richard at azgs.az.gov<mailto:steve.richard at azgs.az.gov>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/geosciml/attachments/20150421/3119423b/attachment.html>

More information about the GeoSciML mailing list