[GeoSciML] Vancouver meeting notes

Boisvert2, Eric (NRCan/RNCan) eric.boisvert2 at canada.ca
Fri Jun 15 07:26:34 EDT 2018


This is timely.  We had that discussion and semi-concluded that OWL would be the canonical representation of the conceptual model.

From: Sen, Marcus A. <mase at bgs.ac.uk>
Sent: June 13, 2018 03:16
To: Public: A mailing list for GeoSciML <geosciml at lists.opengeospatial.org>
Cc: Boisvert2, Eric (NRCan/RNCan) <eric.boisvert2 at canada.ca>
Subject: RE: Vancouver meeting notes

I put a comment in the chat that the issues list from OGC Fort Collins meeting suggests that there was OGC wide discussion of whether UML or ontologies should be the authoritative conceptual model language (https://github.com/ogcscotts/TC-Meeting-topics/issues/53). So perhaps GeoSciML SWG should get involved in this. (Maybe you already intended to do this; I couldn't pick up everything said.)

Marcus

From: GeoSciML <geosciml-bounces+mase=bgs.ac.uk at lists.opengeospatial.org<mailto:geosciml-bounces+mase=bgs.ac.uk at lists.opengeospatial.org>> On Behalf Of Boisvert2, Eric (NRCan/RNCan) via GeoSciML
Sent: 12 June 2018 20:32
To: GeoSciml OGC mainling list <geosciml at lists.opengeospatial.org<mailto:geosciml at lists.opengeospatial.org>>
Cc: Boisvert2, Eric (NRCan/RNCan) <eric.boisvert2 at canada.ca<mailto:eric.boisvert2 at canada.ca>>
Subject: [GeoSciML] Vancouver meeting notes

https://external.opengeospatial.org/twiki_public/GeoSciMLswg/VancouverGsmlJune2018

please tell me if I forgot anything

Eric
________________________________
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/geosciml/attachments/20180615/c182b901/attachment.html>


More information about the GeoSciML mailing list